history repeats...
A 100-year-old home is considered historic in Beaufort; I imagine Europeans scoff at us when they hear that, what with castles dating back to centuries long past.
But relevant is relevant, and in the context of a country that declared its independence some 234 years ago, I suppose a house built in 1908 is historic.
back in Rome, New York, it's my grandma's house, and there's no historic significance to it. It's a farmhouse with a chicken coop in the back and a screened porch that was enclosed somewhere back in the 1970s. The only element that hasn't changed over all these years is that the house is still red and sit next to a field.
Historic? I don't know. My grandmother was the president of the South Rome Senior Citizens, and her son was the N.Y. State secretary of state finance back in the late '80s and early '90s, but Mark Twain never wrote a newspaper article there, Don McLean didn't carve his name into her dining room table while penning "American Pie," and President Roosevelt never stopped over for a nap while hunting bears in the north woods.
We did have awesome Christmases there, though.
So, what makes a sign erected in 1974 historic?
In case you missed it, Beaufort has an ordinance on the books that says all business signs must be "monument signs," that is low and on the ground, rather than the skyscrapers or building hanger sigs, and they must have conformed by last May. (Obviously, that hasn't exactly happened. Last I checked, the McDonald's sign on Boundary was still tripping birds.)
But the city last night said the Beaufort Podiatry sign on Ribaut in Hospitaland was, in fact, historic.
Go figure.
Frank Lloyd Wright didn't design it, and the Emancipation Proclamation wasn't read under it. There is no history; it's a sign. I won't judge whether it's pretty or ugly — that's neither here nor there. But I will say that if we call that sign historic, well, we're a pretty sorry lot, aren't we?
So, next up? MFC. Yup: Maryland Fried Chicken.
I, for one, actually dig the sign. It harkens back to a bygone era, when gaudy ruled. Like the old TAB soda logo. But historic? You've got to be kidding me.
I was in central Florida a couple of weeks ago, and saw a Maryland Fried Chicken sign. It was lovely. All bright red and yellow, with the trademark hen and chick and a sparkling beacon atop it. It stood out against a slate-grey sky much like the old Sands sign popped on the Las Vegas skyline.
Somehow, it works on International Drive. Or in Las Vegas.
In Beaufort? Not so much.
But taste is taste, and, again, that's not what we're arguing, is it?
It's history. I suppose the Chapel of Ease is historic, but maybe not the Royal Frogmore Inn. The lighthouse on Hunting Island? Historic. The OC Welch building on Robert Smalls? No.
Let's all put on our thinking caps for a second, OK? It's just plain embarrassing to call, say, the Burger King sign on Trask Parkway historic. As good as the chicken is at Maryland Fried (and it really is), it certainly isn't John Cross Tavern, God rest its soul.
CK Passante
managing editor
- cpassante's blog
- Login to post comments
- 635 reads

Chris,
I couldn't agree with you more! And if you really want to see the historical signifigance of MFC, just walk inside and take a look at the interior paint job. I like their food, but the decor could cost you your appetite rapidly. One of the things we do at my business is signs, and I can tell you first hand that the local sign ordinances are a mess. Actually, they aren't even local, the sign council uses a generic guide that was written for another city altogether. I have a copy of it that I must frequently refer to, and I'm not sure they even have a copy, if they do, they don't know how to read it.
what about the huge concrete "object" in front of Sea Island Marine? Used to be a support for an old sign, I think. Business owner wanted to take it down a few years ago and it was listed as historically significant...couldn't touch it.....
The MFC sign could (if not already) become historic. It's only a matter of time. It requires the use of the "passage of time strategy". That's the same strategy used by the CIA to get rid of Fidel Castro. While all of their other plans failed their top secret "passage of time" strategy proved very effective and behold the frail, weak, and aged Castro now unable to sustain power over Cuba. So we use the same strategy here with the MFC sign. Allow the owner to keep it and over time it will become historically significant. After all I'm sure the Chicken Man would remind us that his sign was here long before most of you bloggers. I guess if Tooti were around today he'd be arrested for being a public nuisance. How about leaving a little of the old Beaufort for those of us who remember how things were before the comeheres.
I'm out.
I didn't mind the MFC sign when I pulled into Beaufort's driveway and unloaded my bags in 1999. Still don't. But the ordinance was passed long before I "comehere."
So, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, no?
You have a problem with an ordinance proposed and passed by a government years before I roamed Boundary Street, you missed your chance to be a part of the debate. I bet a lot of folks here, new and old, never knew there was an ordinance until ABC on Boundary, what with its sage marquee, announced it to the public last summer.
Here we are in 2008, and the signs have to change. What makes McDonald's sign not historic, but Maryland Fried Chicken's historic?
And, seriously, if we're going to put the MFC sign in the same league with The Arsenal, someone's got some explaining to do.
ck
Maryland fried sign historic,thats a streach but expos facto is not. The city has no legal grounds to make the sign or any signs that were legally put up in the past, that were legal at the time of being put up to be taken down. None, its illegal. Trying to strong arm people and or buisnesses with an illegal aproach is rotten government.
Well Chris as was previously written the Arsenal would be a laugh in the eyes of European historians. "A mere few hundred years old, pleeeeeez ol chap".
It could be said that while the MFC sign may not be historic, within reason, it could very well fall within the realm of "local landmark" and thus stand on the precipice of historic importance.
While I'm not advocating the resurrection of the Dairy Nook as the frontal piece of the new Hilton Gardens, I do believe that a certain "object d'art au pollo" lends a certain air to the community and stands as the vanguard against change for the sake of change.
To the weary traveller seeking the refuge of the County Guvment Complex, the MFC sign is of paramount significance. Only those who have lived here a while would understand the MapQwestionable directive to "go over to where the old Robert Smalls used to be, hear". I could go on and on except I'm not given over to the championing of lost causes although I do believe Landis was scrooged by WADA and that Bin Laden is living in South Florida. Otherwise I say "Free the MFC"!
I don't see where comeheres are relevant to the sign ordinance. It was passed before we became as populated as we are now. In fact the county sign ordinance was a result of locals becoming irritated by some of the signs that were being put up, including many billboards along the highways, blocking many scenic views. The authors of the ordinance went somewhat overboard in the restrictions of small business signs, but that is history now.
As I recall, an existing sign was grandfathered, but if repaired or changed, a permit was required and at that time the sign would have to be brought up to current standards. I don't think MFC has repaired or changed their sign, therefore it looks the same as it did when installed, showing some aging. At some point in time, either because of failing paint or some accident, like a car smashing into it, or a storm blowing it over, it will still be grandfathered until a permit is required.
Maybe the ordinance should be changed to allow a "quaint" sign, like for some of the old Gulf or Esso gas station pumps. Age does add value and perspective on some things. If a group of historic or artistic citizens decide that the MFC sign is "quaint", then there would be an allowance made for historic or artistic restoration work.
...any negativity towards those recent arrivals to our area. Especially those who are Americans. The sarcasm font on my keyboard periodically fails.
I'm just saying that the owner should be allowed to decide when and how to replace his sign.....or not replace the sign.
You and Shadows are good at sarcasm, in fact so good it's hard to tell when you 're being serious. LOL
Unfortunately, there is an unwritten law of the universe that says that the more crowded we become then the number of ordinances and laws are directly proportional to the increase of population. We have very few or even no rules in sparsely populated areas to libraries full of rules in densely populated areas. Robinson Crusoe needed no laws as long as he was alone. Add one person and the dialogue begins on how social interaction will occur. Of course in some societies, the dialogue is one sided like in dictatorships. Just kill off any people with opposing viewpoints. History 101.
When this area was sparsely populated, property owners had much more freedom to manage their property. That right has dwindled as we have more people and therefore more ordinances. Seems as though everyone can chime in now on what a owner can or can't do with their property. Welcome to "civilization". I think.
I sometimes have to think hard to remember certain things about our old town. Places where you could once hunt or fish and rarely encounter another person are mostly long gone. But so is a lot of the bad. We have good drinking water, excellent health care, plenty of law enforcement, variety of shopping and I'll even have to admit....a lot of very good new neighbors.
I promise I'll get the sarcasm font on my keyboard fixed soon....maybe.
...mostly. No one likes to be told what color pants they have to wear (although most of us prefer blue jeans), and I've been criticized for saying more than once that rules are meant to keep us from killing ourselves (because left to our own devices...).
But at some point, you've got to ask yourself what makes Beaufort beautiful. The diversity, sure, and the architecture, yep. But it's not the old rusy signs that you'd find in better shape along I95.
But in the end, that wasn't the point at all. The horse is out of the barn on the sign ordinance; it's done. And I'm thankful for that, for while an Esso sign or the SInclair dinosaur signs might fetch $50 in the local antiques stores, it's not a question of taste, but fairness. Why should one or two people not have to wear their seatbelts or pay their taxes when the rest of us do? Maybe I sound like Ferris Beuller's sister, but the rules are the rules.
As far as being grandfathered in, as was mentioned above, need I remind you that when the ordinance passed in 1990, the Beaufort Podiatry sign was not 25 years old...
ck
Coming clean: I had written "what is good for the goose is good for the gander," and admit that I've used this phrase incorrectly for 41 years. "Gander" meaning "male goose" isn't what I intended, not even if I tried to save myself and force-fit that into the argument somehow. The original proverb was "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Makes sense when refering to female and male geese, respectively. Somewhere along the line, that phrase was bastardized and it's meaning lost. Search me. Because a group of geese is a gaggle, not a gander. I learned this today, so I beg your pardon.
when all is said and done, the sign remains and it looks a little more rustic than it should. Wouln't it be prudent to get out of the way and allow Maryland fried to paint their sign, Beaufort's looks would benefit. The same applys to the tree nazi law that keeps alot of ugly and dangerous trees around that are just waiting on a hurricane to clean them out. The problem is unlike the old billboards that would tend to disapear durring hurricanes, the trees are gonna squash alot of houses/property. Its not gonna look pretty and its not gonna help Beauforts looks a bit.
V8 I agree but reason is not the rule these days. Ever since the occupation of Hilton Head Island began, our new neighbors to the south have sought to create a sort of Long Island Lite, a bland existence where earth tones rule and nothing catches the eye. Quaint, quiet, and oh so boring. That's fine for them for there was no town before they settled. But here in Beaufort we had a town, the county seat as a matter of fact, and all has been well for a long time. And remaining to be fine means that trees must be pruned and signs must be painted.
Free the MFC.....and btw Free Landis while we're at it.
mmm!!
You reference the tree nazi laws and I happen to be looking for information regarding the tree removal laws, since we have several trees we would like to have removed but are not sure of the legal process. Do you know where we could find info, or which county office we should contact? Thanks.
Any of the tree cutting companies would be familiar with the laws. Have you contacted one yet? Some will get the permits for you.